购彩 - 购彩

来源：购彩2021-05-10 17:48

（新春走基层）“外籍女婿”张振汉的新年愿望：将“移动的家”驶向全球******

　　中新网济宁2月2日电题：“外籍女婿”张振汉的新年愿望：将“移动的家”驶向全球

　　作者吕妍

　　“在马来西亚我们也会过华人新年，习俗与中国南方比较相似。”马来西亚华人张振汉(Chong Chern Han)已连续8年留在山东济宁过年，除了包饺子、发红包等，身为“外籍女婿”的张振汉也将马来西亚华人庆祝新年特有的菜式“捞鱼生”带到了济宁的餐桌上，用以祈求来年好运发财。

　　2008年，张振汉被其所在的美国公司外派到深圳出任产品技术和质量监理，第一次来到中国的他看到了中国的发展潜力，便决定留在这里创业。2014年，他来到妻子的老家济宁定居，并与山东东岳专用汽车制造有限公司董事长张养训一起成立了山东奥斯登房车有限公司，就此架起了中国与国际房车合作的桥梁。

　　“房车也被称为‘移动的家’，能帮许多人实现环游世界的梦想，现在我成为了一名‘筑梦者’。”张振汉表示，中国作为全球私家车最多的国家，房车的保有量约20万辆，而美国则在1400万辆以上。近几年，露营经济快速发展，中国房车拥有量也呈现增长态势，作为新兴的消费市场在中国有着非常大的潜力。“宏观来看，中国房车市场预计3年到5年会迎来一个快速增长期，我期待中国的房车产业能冲进全球前几位。”

图为山东奥斯登房车有限公司生产的房车。　受访者供图

　　“中国具备很多生产房车的优势，例如钢材、木材等资源丰富，中国的技术人员学习能力也很强，现在我们的团队已经完全本土化了。”张振汉说，创业之初推出的产品不符合当地人的生活需求，此后，公司每年都会派技术人员到海外去学习、考察。“我们对产品的改良贯穿在每一天，现在我们的产品也越来越符合国际市场的需求。”

　　近年来，张振汉带领团队先后研发30多款房车产品，拥有发明专利8项，外观、实用新型等专利69项，年产房车500多辆，在中国房车领域发展中起到了推动作用，尤其在智能一体化越野房车和智能野营房车的产品研发上填补中国国内空白。

　　“山东对外商和外资企业的支持力度越来越大，我也会推荐朋友来这里投资兴业。”张振汉说，从最初办个证件跑几个部门到现在办事效率大幅提升，政府提供“店小二”式的服务，业务办理实现数字化，每年都能收到新政策，城市的营商环境持续优化。

　　张振汉表示，公司目前正不断加大研发投入，将探索制造“远征式房车”，以更高端的技术打通全球房车市场。未来，公司将持续深耕国际市场，探路中国市场，引进先进生产设备，提高效率增加产能，让房车越开越远，开向全球。“新的一年，我希望中国发展的越来越好，人们的生活和平、和谐，我也将继续做好房车事业，和中国企业家携手合作共赢，让中国房车驶向世界。”(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.